No True Christian Can Vote For The Party of Death
Let me state from the outset: you can not be a true Christian and vote Democrat, the party of death. To be a Christian is to be against death. Jesus came that we might have life and life more abundantly.
This is the latest group of demonic people to try and bamboozle us. They claim they are:
“Faithful, compassionate evangelicals exercising our God-given citizenship by voting for someone who better reflects Christian values.”
Yet nothing could be further from the truth. How Kamala Harris reflects Christian values couldn’t be further from the truth. Here are some quotes from Kamala Harris on abortion taken from X (formerly Twitter):
What about Kamala Harris’s VP Nominee Tim Walz?
That’s right; he claims that bans on murdering babies are dangerous and reckless. That’s right, not being able to murder babies is dangerous to Tim Walz. This is the demonic and demented thinking of the Democrats—the same line of thinking so many professing “Christians” across America share. Read the quote from the late Timothy Keller:
“The Bible tells us that idolatry, abortion, and ignoring the poor are all grievous sins. But it doesn’t tell us exactly HOW we are to apply these norms to a pluralistic democracy. . . . I know abortion is a sin, but the Bible doesn’t tell me the best political policy to decrease or end abortion in this country, nor which political or legal policies are most effective to that end.”
- Timothy Keller
Basham, Megan. Shepherds for Sale: How Evangelical Leaders Traded the Truth for a Leftist Agenda (p. 59). HarperCollins. Kindle Edition.
That’s right, Timothy Keller, who was a significant voice among Evangelical Christians in America, claims the Bible doesn’t actually tell us how to oppose abortion. I’m not sure which Bible Keller was reading, but I can assure you that God is evident on the topic of abortion and how we are to oppose it. We are to oppose the murder of babies 100%.
Keller isn’t the only one from within the church in America to think this way:
Yes, according to Nancy French here, we have to vote for the most pro-abortion Democrat candidates ever to save the GOP. According to her reasoning, we have to vote for those who will cause more blood of babies to be spilled to prevent the blood of babies from being shed.
We can have a conversation about Trump’s statement; for my take on this, watch here and start at the 25:48 minute mark:
This is the sick rationale used not by those who are against the church but by those who claim to be part of the body of Christ.
I can’t think of a better example of Peter’s warning against the false teachers that bring destructive heresies (2 Peter 2:1). What is more destructive than ending the lives of our future generations?
When Roe v Wade was the law of the land, over 6M babies were murdered in the womb. Lives that were brutally ripped apart in many cases and even left to die when the abortion attempt was botched.
Now imagine that number of 6 million and keep multiplying that. If you think I am exaggerating, just think about the fact that the Planned Parenthood murder mobile showed up at the recent 2024 Democratic National Convention to perform abortions for free.
Physicians were providing abortions and vasectomies by appointment on Monday in the West Loop and said they planned to continue doing so Tuesday. As of Monday evening, no appointments on Tuesday were available. The Chicago Abortion Fund has also been distributing free emergency contraceptive at the site.
You read that correctly, and I hope you were taken aghast at what you just read. So many people wanted to get abortions that there were no appointments available. That is the state of the craze to shed innocent blood in America today, and that should scare you.
Of course, I could show you tons of footage along with news articles of the crazed masses demonstrating for their “right” to shed the blood of babies. However, that isn’t my point. My point is why we, as Christians, can not vote for the party that is just, if not more, blood-crazed than the American citizens they claim to represent. If we have God’s Holy Spirit in us and leading us in all truth, then there is no way we can vote for Harris and Walz, at least not without profound conviction from the Holy Spirit and searing of conscience.
We are supposed to serve the God who told us He came so that we might have life and life more abundantly. That very same God is supposed to be Lord over our lives. That isn’t just a fancy title; it is supposed to mean that God is in charge of every part of our lives, including how we vote.
We are told we are saved: “If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.” (Romans 10:9)
That isn’t something we say like a magical phrase to come into right relationship with God. It is a posture of bowing the knee to the King of Kings and Lord of Lords, whereby we place Jesus as the head of our lives. You see, the Word Lord actually has a meaning. Read this meaning from Strong’s:
Kurios:
1) he to whom a person or thing belongs, about which he has power of deciding; master, lord 1a) the possessor and disposer of a thing 1a1) the owner; one who has control of the person, the master. 1c) this title is given to: God, the Messiah Synonym.
According to the Greek definition, we Christians belong to Jesus. He is supposed to have mastery and authority over us in every conceivable way. I ask then, how is it that we, who have the Lord of life as our master, are able to vote for those who run for office and want Roe v Wade reinstated? The answer is we can’t, at least not without seriously jeopardizing our eternal security.
I can’t think of how anyone in their right mind who studies the Bible seriously, has the Holy Spirit leading and teaching them and seeks to live a holy life could vote for a Presidential and Vice Presidential candidate who bays for the blood of babies.
It’s unconscionable to condone the murder of babies for any reason if anyone is in Christ Jesus.
Some go even further, though. Some even go to the maddening length of trying to use scripture to defend abortion. To use scripture to defend abortion is like using a gun to perform brain surgery. It is utterly futile and dangerous. Futile because over and over again, from Genesis to Revelation, the Bible is 100% pro-life. It is dangerous because when people do that, they are taking God’s holy Word and attempting to twist it the same way Satan tried to do when he tempted Jesus in the wilderness.
What about Numbers 5:11-31 or 2 Samuel 12, you may ask? Does either part of scripture condone abortion, the wanton murder of a baby? The emphatic answer is no! Both sections deal with the consequences of a woman if she commits adultery—the deliberate sexual sin of a woman, which is really no different in most cases of the deliberate sexual sin of a woman and her not wanting to accept the consequences and responsibility of her choice today. No baby should ever have to pay the price for someone else's sin. This is especially true if a woman is the victim of rape. No innocent baby should have to pay the penalty for someone else’s sin.
Another section of scripture those of satanic persuasion like to use is Exodus 21:22-25:
22 “If men fight and hit a pregnant woman and her child is born prematurely, but there is no serious injury, the one who hit her will surely be punished in accordance with what the woman’s husband demands of him, and he will pay what the court decides. 23 But if there is serious injury, then you will give a life for a life, 24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25 burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise.
This section of scripture clearly tells us what is supposed to happen under Mosaic Law if men are fighting and a woman gives birth prematurely or miscarries. Of course, Jesus mentioned that there is no more such thing as an eye for an eye or tooth for a tooth in His sermon on the mount (Matthew 5:43-48).
That means that the passages in Exodus, Numbers, and 2 Samual 12 no longer apply to us today, as we are now under the new and better covenant.
The fact that anyone would dare to use scripture to defend the murder of the unborn is sick and twisted by any objective biblical standard. It just goes to show the depravity that mankind will go to to be able to shed the blood of our most precious.
What makes this worse is that a significant portion of the time, this comes from those claiming to be of Christ. Christians who defend abortion are most certainly worse than an unbeliever who is honest and doesn’t claim to be of Christ.
Profaning the name of Jesus, God, is listed as one of the gravest sins and one that will ensure a guilty verdict from God:
Exodus 20:7
“You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain, for the Lord will not hold guiltless anyone who takes his name in vain.”
I’m 100% sure that the most profound meaning of this commandment is for anyone who identifies as a Christian yet lives in a manner contrary to Jesus's commandments. Let us keep this in mind as we decide who we should and shouldn’t vote for as Christians.
While either set of candidates is in no way Christian, we should keep in mind which set is baying for blood and which isn’t. Which set, Harris and Walz or Tump and Vance, wants to overturn Roe v Wade, and which doesn’t? Which set can Christians work with, and which set is against Christianity?
Just remember this:
Tim Walz is So Radically Pro-Abortion, He Signed a Bill Allowing Forced Abortions
In fact:
“Data from the Minnesota Department of Health indicate that since Governor Walz was inaugurated in 2019, eight babies survived abortion attempts in Minnesota,” wrote New:
On five occasions, no measures were taken to preserve life. On three occasions, only comfort care was provided. Tragically, all of these babies died. Instead of strengthening protections for these children, SF 2995 repealed the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, which was intended to provide legal protection for infants who survived abortions.